Ideological Dyslexia

When You Can’t Tell Your Left From Your Right

When it comes to the ideological landscape, I often feel navigationally dysfunctional. Am I heading Left, leaning Right, or turning circles around in the Centre?

I am for freedom of speech: is that Right or Left? It’s hard to say these days.

I am pro markets (right), but socially permissive (left). I am a feminist (left), but I don’t believe in quotas (right). I overschedule my children with classes in elite pastimes, including piano and golf (right). I care enormously about basic health care and primary education (left), as well as creating an environment within which entrepreneurs can flourish (right).I believe stray dogs are a menace (in India = extreme right).

I identify as liberal, but not as woke. I detest virtue signaling as much as paternalism. I am proud of being Indian, but against nationalism.

To be honest, most of the time I’m just astonished, and a little weary, of the labeling, the group think and the anger that everyone seems to feel against everyone else who has different views. The concept of agreeing to disagree, except on the rules of how to disagree civilly, has been sidelined into a quaint anachronism by twitter and its trolls.

In any case, terms like Left and Right have always been situational, changing form and significance in different contexts: the French Revolution, the Russian revolution, the rise of socialism and nationalism in Europe, the birth of student movements in the United States, the global environmental movement, and the identity politics of contemporary times in India and beyond.

The terms also mutate with the age and circumstances of the person deploying them: college student, salary man, single, en famille and so on. (As the hoary saying goes: If someone isn’t a socialist at 20, they have no heart. If they’re not conservative by the time they are 40, they’ve no brain.”)

I’m at the age, and of the circumstances, where I’ve come to believe that wisdom is when you figure out how to make sense of the world around you not through the prism of over-determined ideological labels, but through an internal multifocal lens with shades of rationality, empathy, pragmatism, and idealism.

Instead of Left, Right and Centre, how about categorizing our worldviews into sense, sensibility, and sanity? Or, “Maybe, Could Be, Should Be”? One friend even suggested. “This, That and the Other,” as an improved replacement.

***

As problematic as the Left-Right labels may be, the history of how directional categories came to stand for ideological ones is fascinating. The terms began as literal descriptions of the physical placement of politicians in the French National Assembly during La Révolution.

By the summer of 1789 the French Revolution had gained steam and an angry mob had just stormed the Bastille. The National Assembly gathered in Paris with the goal of writing a new constitution. But the delegates were deeply divided over the issue of how much authority King Louis XVI should have. Should the monarch have the right to an absolute veto?

As the debate raged, the two main factions staked out distinct geographies in the assembly hall. The anti-royalist revolutionaries seated themselves to the presiding officer’s left, while the more conservative, aristocratic supporters of a monarchical veto, gathered to the right. 

Summoning of the Estates General at Versailles, 5 May 1789, by Auguste Couder

© RMN-Grand Palais (Château de  Versailles) / Daniel Arnaudet / Gérard Blot

“I tried to sit in different parts of the hall and not to adopt any marked spot, so as to remain more the master of my opinion,” one right-wing baron wrote, according to the History Channel, “but I was compelled absolutely to abandon the left or else be condemned always to vote alone and thus be subjected to jeers from the galleries.”

The ideological divisions deepened during the 1790s, when French newspapers began making references to the progressive “left” and traditionalist “right” of the French assembly. By the mid-19th century, “left” and “right” had entered the French vernacular as shorthand for opposing political ideologies.

In other words, those who wanted to hew closer to tradition were on the right, and those who wanted more change were on the left. It was the classic: status quoists vs revolutionaries divide.

France’s “left” and “right” labels filtered out to the rest of the world during the 1800s, but they weren’t common in English-speaking countries until the early 20th century. The rest may be history, but it is a complex and often confounding one.

****

All interesting stuff, but there is also research in psychology to show that Left and Right might have psychological meaning that is embedded deep in human consciousness, and that long predates the French Revolution.

 Dualistic thinking is a hallmark of varied metaphysics across the globe. The Chinese concept of Ying-Yang being a case in point.

In a lot of Western thought, the Right has been associated with “good” “male” “truth” “light,” while the Left with “bad” “female” “deceit” “darkness.  In the Bible, the elect sit on the right hand of God.

In India, people have traditionally used their left hand for “dirty” ablutions and their “clean,” right hand for eating or making offerings to the Gods.

Languages reflect this duality too. In many Romance languages, for example, the left is related to odd or negative aspects of life. For example, sinistra, the Latin word for left, is the root for our word "sinister." Gauche, the French word for left, also means unsophisticated or awkward. In English, we give people "left-handed compliments," and fight for our “rights.” When someone is your “right hand man,” he’s a good bloke.

In today’s world the “negative” qualities/entities located on the Left column of many ancient dualisms – female, heretic, slave - have through historical processes come to be associated with the ideological Left. Now how fascinating is that?

Thoughts? Do share them in the comments section.

And do pretty please think about becoming a paid subscriber. Us writerly entrepreneurs rely on you, dear discerning reader, to understand the value of good writing and to be willing to support those of us who are working independently of mainstream media.

Many, many, thanks,

Until next week,

Pallavi